<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways to Make Your Website Traffic Grow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/5-ways-to-make-your-website-traffic-grow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/5-ways-to-make-your-website-traffic-grow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/5-ways-to-make-your-website-traffic-grow/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1674#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>@Leonard,
I often see Google rank YouTube vids high and I&#039;m not sure that has much to do with SEO, but more that they own both. I think it does help to have video, since people also search for Just Video&#039;s which many site owners do not think about often. There really is 3 different common searches: Content, Image and Video. Site owners need to keep this in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leonard,<br />
I often see Google rank YouTube vids high and I&#8217;m not sure that has much to do with SEO, but more that they own both. I think it does help to have video, since people also search for Just Video&#8217;s which many site owners do not think about often. There really is 3 different common searches: Content, Image and Video. Site owners need to keep this in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/5-ways-to-make-your-website-traffic-grow/#comment-5928</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1674#comment-5928</guid>
		<description>This topic is certainly of interest to domainers just starting to develop minisites.  On the issue of download times, I see many cities with 00:00:00 time spent on the site.  I can only assume they have dial-up connections and they have difficulty downloading the graphical template and video set to autoplay so they exit without ever seeing the site.  Perhaps if I get rid of autoplay that will speed up their download time somewhat but they still won&#039;t be able to view the videos.  And I&#039;ve also noticed that for these video-heavy sites, Google is ranking the privacy page and links page (with no content) higher than the home page.  I&#039;m guessing Google&#039;s algorithm factors download speed into the equation because why else would a page with no content rank higher than one with content (all other factors equivalent because it is the same site).  

I&#039;m just curious if you&#039;ve seen this as well. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic is certainly of interest to domainers just starting to develop minisites.  On the issue of download times, I see many cities with 00:00:00 time spent on the site.  I can only assume they have dial-up connections and they have difficulty downloading the graphical template and video set to autoplay so they exit without ever seeing the site.  Perhaps if I get rid of autoplay that will speed up their download time somewhat but they still won&#8217;t be able to view the videos.  And I&#8217;ve also noticed that for these video-heavy sites, Google is ranking the privacy page and links page (with no content) higher than the home page.  I&#8217;m guessing Google&#8217;s algorithm factors download speed into the equation because why else would a page with no content rank higher than one with content (all other factors equivalent because it is the same site).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious if you&#8217;ve seen this as well. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

