<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Oops: CNN &#8220;Knows&#8221; Domain Names But&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: CNN Loses out on $7,900 and Coldwar.com : DotWeekly.com Domain Name Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6785</link>
		<dc:creator>CNN Loses out on $7,900 and Coldwar.com : DotWeekly.com Domain Name Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6785</guid>
		<description>[...] on June 20, 2009 I had discovered that the domain name Coldwar.com had hit expired status and the past owner was CNN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on June 20, 2009 I had discovered that the domain name Coldwar.com had hit expired status and the past owner was CNN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6231</guid>
		<description>@LazyDomaining
Well, the domain could of easily been renewed 10yrs ago, for 10 yrs.. but having an expired CC on file can prevent domain renewal. Yes renewal messages can be sent, but A Lot of people have spam blockers set up which catch many renewal notices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LazyDomaining<br />
Well, the domain could of easily been renewed 10yrs ago, for 10 yrs.. but having an expired CC on file can prevent domain renewal. Yes renewal messages can be sent, but A Lot of people have spam blockers set up which catch many renewal notices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LazyDomaining</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6201</link>
		<dc:creator>LazyDomaining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6201</guid>
		<description>@James
Same thoughts here. Just doesn&#039;t make sense. Renewing for 10years is not a bad idea for such premium names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James<br />
Same thoughts here. Just doesn&#8217;t make sense. Renewing for 10years is not a bad idea for such premium names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6199</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6199</guid>
		<description>Good find Jamie ... thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find Jamie &#8230; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6195</guid>
		<description>Why dont people with the sort of money CNN has just renew the domain for ten years?

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont people with the sort of money CNN has just renew the domain for ten years?</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6187</guid>
		<description>Thanks Reece. I agree what you are speaking about! One thing I didn&#039;t really write about due to it just being a &quot;guess&quot;... Since the &quot;last update&quot; according to whois was in May, makes me think that maybe they Turned Off Auto-Renew then? It&#039;s hard to say but it wasn&#039;t that long ago (likely when they got a notification from the registrar) with the update of some kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Reece. I agree what you are speaking about! One thing I didn&#8217;t really write about due to it just being a &#8220;guess&#8221;&#8230; Since the &#8220;last update&#8221; according to whois was in May, makes me think that maybe they Turned Off Auto-Renew then? It&#8217;s hard to say but it wasn&#8217;t that long ago (likely when they got a notification from the registrar) with the update of some kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reece Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/cnn-oops-cnn-knows-domain-names-but/#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Reece Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1806#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>Nice detective work there Jamie! 

I still can&#039;t understand why some companies don&#039;t take better care of their domains -- heck, paying someone a full-time salary *just* to make sure their domains get renewed every year would be a great investment for a company this size and all it stands to lose if the wrong domains expire on them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice detective work there Jamie! </p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t understand why some companies don&#8217;t take better care of their domains &#8212; heck, paying someone a full-time salary *just* to make sure their domains get renewed every year would be a great investment for a company this size and all it stands to lose if the wrong domains expire on them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

