<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter.com a Thing Of The Past Already?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nSathees</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8856</link>
		<dc:creator>nSathees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8856</guid>
		<description>Twitter and FB are open virus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter and FB are open virus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8852</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8852</guid>
		<description>Jamz, I agree with you.  

Anyone interested, please see my followup response, and details about my experience with Twitter (with credit back to Jamz) for the article, on my blog at http://www.successclick.com. I usually move more detailed responses to my blog, and for sure I can&#039;t put them on Twitter. lol

Great article, Jamz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamz, I agree with you.  </p>
<p>Anyone interested, please see my followup response, and details about my experience with Twitter (with credit back to Jamz) for the article, on my blog at <a href="http://www.successclick.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.successclick.com</a>. I usually move more detailed responses to my blog, and for sure I can&#8217;t put them on Twitter. lol</p>
<p>Great article, Jamz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8850</guid>
		<description>99% of the tweets on Twitter are idiotic and I doubt anyone is even reading them. 

Yesterday the tweets about Balloon Boy peaked at 30,000 per minute.  All saying the same things.

It can be useful, but only in a limited amount of ways and you have to know what you&#039;re doing.

Facebook is much more well structured and stronger for networking and marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99% of the tweets on Twitter are idiotic and I doubt anyone is even reading them. </p>
<p>Yesterday the tweets about Balloon Boy peaked at 30,000 per minute.  All saying the same things.</p>
<p>It can be useful, but only in a limited amount of ways and you have to know what you&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p>Facebook is much more well structured and stronger for networking and marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Fulton</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>Just a note on Twitter traffic.. it is only a fraction of the actual usage. Because of the open API there are people not even visiting Twitter.com but still active:

Top 100 Twitter app by usage today:
http://twitstat.com/twitterclientusers.html

Note that &quot;Web&quot; use accounts for only 20%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note on Twitter traffic.. it is only a fraction of the actual usage. Because of the open API there are people not even visiting Twitter.com but still active:</p>
<p>Top 100 Twitter app by usage today:<br />
<a href="http://twitstat.com/twitterclientusers.html" rel="nofollow">http://twitstat.com/twitterclientusers.html</a></p>
<p>Note that &#8220;Web&#8221; use accounts for only 20%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8846</guid>
		<description>Twitter and other social services sites are just platforms to waste time and platforms for spammers to sell to other spammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter and other social services sites are just platforms to waste time and platforms for spammers to sell to other spammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8843</guid>
		<description>@Fred,
I never said they were &quot;Dead&quot;. I said &quot;I think Twitter is going to lose popularity and slowly fade into the sunset unless a lot of positive changes take place.&quot; Since traffic has flattened, which I think is because of many of the problems I stated, unless something changes.. the site will continue to stay flat and even go down in users. If you though I meant &quot;slowly fad into the sunset unless a lot of positive changes take place&quot; meant it was &quot;Dead&quot;, that is not the case. A site with Millions of month unique visitors can not be &quot;dead&quot;.
~
I have seen numbers in the past (I didn&#039;t look for them again) but I thought it said some 5% of twitter users make up the majority of the activity on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred,<br />
I never said they were &#8220;Dead&#8221;. I said &#8220;I think Twitter is going to lose popularity and slowly fade into the sunset unless a lot of positive changes take place.&#8221; Since traffic has flattened, which I think is because of many of the problems I stated, unless something changes.. the site will continue to stay flat and even go down in users. If you though I meant &#8220;slowly fad into the sunset unless a lot of positive changes take place&#8221; meant it was &#8220;Dead&#8221;, that is not the case. A site with Millions of month unique visitors can not be &#8220;dead&#8221;.<br />
~<br />
I have seen numbers in the past (I didn&#8217;t look for them again) but I thought it said some 5% of twitter users make up the majority of the activity on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8842</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8842</guid>
		<description>Their traffic has fallen flat after an explosive growth over the past year.  So that means the service is dead?  Are you kidding me?  And dcmike, the fact that you compare Twitter to Myspace is the first indication that you have zero knowledge of anything to do with social media.  Stick to parking pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their traffic has fallen flat after an explosive growth over the past year.  So that means the service is dead?  Are you kidding me?  And dcmike, the fact that you compare Twitter to Myspace is the first indication that you have zero knowledge of anything to do with social media.  Stick to parking pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8840</guid>
		<description>@Mark,
Thanks for the link. I do heavily find Twitter useful and you can really make money using it but getting tweets about all the blah blah making money, how to get x amount of followers is getting old. It was just interesting to see traffic numbers flat for several months now. Then you hear celebs saying they are done with twitter etc. I think several things are pointing to traffic numbers going down.. but again, only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark,<br />
Thanks for the link. I do heavily find Twitter useful and you can really make money using it but getting tweets about all the blah blah making money, how to get x amount of followers is getting old. It was just interesting to see traffic numbers flat for several months now. Then you hear celebs saying they are done with twitter etc. I think several things are pointing to traffic numbers going down.. but again, only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcmike77</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8839</link>
		<dc:creator>dcmike77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8839</guid>
		<description>Twitter is just a fad. Who uses myspace anymore? Or what about paging? Those were all cool at one time not anymore. 

Google Wave is coming and will blow twitter out of the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is just a fad. Who uses myspace anymore? Or what about paging? Those were all cool at one time not anymore. </p>
<p>Google Wave is coming and will blow twitter out of the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8838</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8838</guid>
		<description>@Anthony,
I think FB changed to a more Twitter approach with it&#039;s last update. As for an app, I have no clue because I do not use my phone on the net.. which means I know very little about apps. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anthony,<br />
I think FB changed to a more Twitter approach with it&#8217;s last update. As for an app, I have no clue because I do not use my phone on the net.. which means I know very little about apps. <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Report</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8834</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8834</guid>
		<description>I think Twitter is becoming a fixture on the internet.  Many websites, newspapers, magazines, tv newscasts and businesses have twitter accounts to keep in touch with their followers - and they actively promote their accounts.  It&#039;s a great business tool to give quick updates and news to a group of people who are interested in what you have.  Twitter has had explosive growth so it&#039;s bound to slow down somewhat, but it will keep growing.  Twitter offers something MySpace and Facebook don&#039;t.  And I think the search function of Twitter will be big - getting real time news and feedback about events from millions of users - that is a great feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Twitter is becoming a fixture on the internet.  Many websites, newspapers, magazines, tv newscasts and businesses have twitter accounts to keep in touch with their followers &#8211; and they actively promote their accounts.  It&#8217;s a great business tool to give quick updates and news to a group of people who are interested in what you have.  Twitter has had explosive growth so it&#8217;s bound to slow down somewhat, but it will keep growing.  Twitter offers something MySpace and Facebook don&#8217;t.  And I think the search function of Twitter will be big &#8211; getting real time news and feedback about events from millions of users &#8211; that is a great feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason at GoDrops.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason at GoDrops.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8833</guid>
		<description>Twitter is awesome! Go where the people are! Learn how to use it and to your advantage and it will pay you back...  e.g. I&#039;ve opened up a chat for only my twitter friends (people I follow) at http://godrops.com/chat 

There are ways to cut down on spam, it all goes down to how &#039;trust&#039; is setup. With twitter it&#039;s followers. Use it or don&#039;t, twitter and things like it are here to stay...

P.S. @Jamie, I like how you categorize (prefix) your tweets =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is awesome! Go where the people are! Learn how to use it and to your advantage and it will pay you back&#8230;  e.g. I&#8217;ve opened up a chat for only my twitter friends (people I follow) at <a href="http://godrops.com/chat" rel="nofollow">http://godrops.com/chat</a> </p>
<p>There are ways to cut down on spam, it all goes down to how &#8216;trust&#8217; is setup. With twitter it&#8217;s followers. Use it or don&#8217;t, twitter and things like it are here to stay&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S. @Jamie, I like how you categorize (prefix) your tweets =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8832</guid>
		<description>@Fred,
50 million a day? Twitter doesn&#039;t even get 25 Million unique visitors a Month. Here is a TechCrunch article recently  about numbers going flat for Twitter. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/as-facebook-nears-100m-u-s-visitors-twitter-falls-further-behind-in-the-rear-view-mirror/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred,<br />
50 million a day? Twitter doesn&#8217;t even get 25 Million unique visitors a Month. Here is a TechCrunch article recently  about numbers going flat for Twitter. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/as-facebook-nears-100m-u-s-visitors-twitter-falls-further-behind-in-the-rear-view-mirror/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/as-facebook-nears-100m-u-s-visitors-twitter-falls-further-behind-in-the-rear-view-mirror/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8831</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8831</guid>
		<description>Jamie ... Here&#039;s the question.

What&#039;s most likely to happen ?

Facebook adding a Twitter like app ?

or Twitter becoming a Facebook ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie &#8230; Here&#8217;s the question.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s most likely to happen ?</p>
<p>Facebook adding a Twitter like app ?</p>
<p>or Twitter becoming a Facebook ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Fulton</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/is-twitter-com-a-thing-of-the-past-already/#comment-8828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2712#comment-8828</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys, Twitter isn&#039;t going anywhere.. might as well make the most of it. Great for networking, great for business, why even compare it with FB?

Any site getting downtime obviously is ridiculously popular... why would they become thing of the past?

There are tools to fix alot of things you mentioned. Follow directions here to opt out of auto DMs:
http://twitter.com/optmeout

Many spam block tools available and Twitter even implemented a prominent SPAM link right next to the follow/unfollow links just 2 days ago... give it some time, I think it will stomp out 90% of spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys, Twitter isn&#8217;t going anywhere.. might as well make the most of it. Great for networking, great for business, why even compare it with FB?</p>
<p>Any site getting downtime obviously is ridiculously popular&#8230; why would they become thing of the past?</p>
<p>There are tools to fix alot of things you mentioned. Follow directions here to opt out of auto DMs:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/optmeout" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/optmeout</a></p>
<p>Many spam block tools available and Twitter even implemented a prominent SPAM link right next to the follow/unfollow links just 2 days ago&#8230; give it some time, I think it will stomp out 90% of spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

