<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LandOfWineAndFood.com California Travel Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/land-of-wine-and-food-com-california-travel-guide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/land-of-wine-and-food-com-california-travel-guide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BullS</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/land-of-wine-and-food-com-california-travel-guide/#comment-9002</link>
		<dc:creator>BullS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2777#comment-9002</guid>
		<description>I have WineInCalifornia.com and WinesInCalifornia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have WineInCalifornia.com and WinesInCalifornia.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/land-of-wine-and-food-com-california-travel-guide/#comment-8994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2777#comment-8994</guid>
		<description>@Jon,
I think they are Right On really. California.com would be under used IMO by them. VisitCalifornia.com is good for them. I really had no problems remembering LandOfWineAndFood.com and I didn&#039;t write it down. It is 5 words, but again.. watching the Specific Ad, really makes the domain name stick, even though it&#039;s 5 words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon,<br />
I think they are Right On really. California.com would be under used IMO by them. VisitCalifornia.com is good for them. I really had no problems remembering LandOfWineAndFood.com and I didn&#8217;t write it down. It is 5 words, but again.. watching the Specific Ad, really makes the domain name stick, even though it&#8217;s 5 words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/land-of-wine-and-food-com-california-travel-guide/#comment-8993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2777#comment-8993</guid>
		<description>California Travel and Tourism Commission is on the right track, but their domain selection is sub-par. VisitCalifornia.com is very nice for what they are doing, but it&#039;s no match to California.com.

LandOfWineAndFood.com is a 5-word domain name, which means the only way to remember it is to write it down. CaliforniaWine.com would be a much better domain to promote wine-related tourism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California Travel and Tourism Commission is on the right track, but their domain selection is sub-par. VisitCalifornia.com is very nice for what they are doing, but it&#8217;s no match to California.com.</p>
<p>LandOfWineAndFood.com is a 5-word domain name, which means the only way to remember it is to write it down. CaliforniaWine.com would be a much better domain to promote wine-related tourism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

