<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listing domain names on SnapNames is getting easier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Listing Domain Names on SnapNames.com is a Snap! : Dot Weekly Domain Name Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Listing Domain Names on SnapNames.com is a Snap! : Dot Weekly Domain Name Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=714#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>[...] had wrote about the new process of listing domain names on SnapNames.com but wanted to revisit it now that I have used the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had wrote about the new process of listing domain names on SnapNames.com but wanted to revisit it now that I have used the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listing domain names on SnapNames is getting easier : Dot Weekly &#8230; &#124; Legal Webmastering</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Listing domain names on SnapNames is getting easier : Dot Weekly &#8230; &#124; Legal Webmastering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=714#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>[...] the example place here: Listing field obloquy on SnapNames is effort easier : Dot Weekly &#8230;     Posted in Uncategorized on Jan 22nd, 2009, 10:15 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the example place here: Listing field obloquy on SnapNames is effort easier : Dot Weekly &#8230;     Posted in Uncategorized on Jan 22nd, 2009, 10:15 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=714#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>I really hope they eventually let you list domains from other registrars.  I really want to try selling on Snapnames, but I&#039;m not really interested in moving domains from Godaddy to Moniker.  Glad to hear they improved the listing process though.

**Jamie Says*
It works best with Moniker so they can easily transfer the domain. For security reasons, it&#039;s much easier to confirm ownership of the domain as well. Moniker is a very good registrar and I would suggest trying them out. I was a huge and still am Godaddy fan, but Moniker is great as well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope they eventually let you list domains from other registrars.  I really want to try selling on Snapnames, but I&#8217;m not really interested in moving domains from Godaddy to Moniker.  Glad to hear they improved the listing process though.</p>
<p>**Jamie Says*<br />
It works best with Moniker so they can easily transfer the domain. For security reasons, it&#8217;s much easier to confirm ownership of the domain as well. Moniker is a very good registrar and I would suggest trying them out. I was a huge and still am Godaddy fan, but Moniker is great as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notlikeyou</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domain-names-on-snapnames-is-getting-easier/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>notlikeyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=714#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>Any info on changes to fees/commission/escrow structure as a result of this integration?

**Jamie Says**
I will look into this but right now I am going to say no. The only fee is the 20% sold commission, which can be looked at as Good IMO. No listing fee, no Escrow fee etc. It&#039;s just a flat 20%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any info on changes to fees/commission/escrow structure as a result of this integration?</p>
<p>**Jamie Says**<br />
I will look into this but right now I am going to say no. The only fee is the 20% sold commission, which can be looked at as Good IMO. No listing fee, no Escrow fee etc. It&#8217;s just a flat 20%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

