<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listing domains on SnapNames ~ Pending Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3563</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3563</guid>
		<description>Hi Jamie,
We missed you at the &quot;Viking Feast Inadmissable Evidence Party&quot; at Domainfest last week. Rumor was that you were &quot;dizzy&quot; after the Universal Tour ride &quot;Mummy&#039;s Revenge&quot;... ;-)

Regarding the pending review for Snap submissions, the delay is caused by checking for TM&#039;s and as stated, ridiculous prices. Also, they review your domains for possible featuring on their homepage specials. Give Snapnames a few months to iron out the bugs in the system. They always come through nicely for me, and I sell several thousand dollars in domains every month.  My favorite domain-selling platform. Kudos to JS, MVT and the whole gang at Snapnames/Moniker for putting this system into place. By Summer 09, I predict most domainers will have a decent amount of domains for sale on Snap.

peace

Stephen Douglas
http://www.successclick.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jamie,<br />
We missed you at the &#8220;Viking Feast Inadmissable Evidence Party&#8221; at Domainfest last week. Rumor was that you were &#8220;dizzy&#8221; after the Universal Tour ride &#8220;Mummy&#8217;s Revenge&#8221;&#8230; <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regarding the pending review for Snap submissions, the delay is caused by checking for TM&#8217;s and as stated, ridiculous prices. Also, they review your domains for possible featuring on their homepage specials. Give Snapnames a few months to iron out the bugs in the system. They always come through nicely for me, and I sell several thousand dollars in domains every month.  My favorite domain-selling platform. Kudos to JS, MVT and the whole gang at Snapnames/Moniker for putting this system into place. By Summer 09, I predict most domainers will have a decent amount of domains for sale on Snap.</p>
<p>peace</p>
<p>Stephen Douglas<br />
<a href="http://www.successclick.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.successclick.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seyi</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>Seyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3541</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that you just notice this with Snapnames. They have good platform but their &quot;pending review&quot; is a rampant problem regardless of the names or prices. I had same problem last year with listed name &quot;pending review&quot; for months. I also had couple of friends with great names having the same  problem. And it even worst when your account manager is helpless about it. That made me conclude it is not really a human delay; it must be bugs in their system...I wonder why it is taking forever to rectify. I hope you don&#039;t wait for too long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that you just notice this with Snapnames. They have good platform but their &#8220;pending review&#8221; is a rampant problem regardless of the names or prices. I had same problem last year with listed name &#8220;pending review&#8221; for months. I also had couple of friends with great names having the same  problem. And it even worst when your account manager is helpless about it. That made me conclude it is not really a human delay; it must be bugs in their system&#8230;I wonder why it is taking forever to rectify. I hope you don&#8217;t wait for too long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>@ Tim
Besure to use the Advanced Search. You can select the &quot;kind&quot; of domain names you are looking for. If you are looking for Expiring Domains, you can always use BuyExpringDomains.com ;) but the tabs on Snap allow you to search Buy It Now, In Auction, Available Soon (expiring) etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tim<br />
Besure to use the Advanced Search. You can select the &#8220;kind&#8221; of domain names you are looking for. If you are looking for Expiring Domains, you can always use BuyExpringDomains.com <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  but the tabs on Snap allow you to search Buy It Now, In Auction, Available Soon (expiring) etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3534</guid>
		<description>the flood of names for sale at snap is a nightmare!

I&#039;m wasting a huge amount of time sifting through it all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the flood of names for sale at snap is a nightmare!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wasting a huge amount of time sifting through it all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3533</guid>
		<description>@Josh
I do not think SnapNames has any say in the price you choose but they could filter out some that are really crazy. (Like many listed on eBay). I do agree about Trademarks, but Snap also dropcatches many TM&#039;s daily, so that is two sided... For the Ultra Naughty Language.. did you happen to see the last Adult Auction they held? I don&#039;t think they filter sassy words ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh<br />
I do not think SnapNames has any say in the price you choose but they could filter out some that are really crazy. (Like many listed on eBay). I do agree about Trademarks, but Snap also dropcatches many TM&#8217;s daily, so that is two sided&#8230; For the Ultra Naughty Language.. did you happen to see the last Adult Auction they held? I don&#8217;t think they filter sassy words <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/listing-domains-on-snapnames-pending-review/#comment-3532</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=733#comment-3532</guid>
		<description>They might choose to reject the price you have chosen, and they might also be filtering for trademarks and ultra naughty language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They might choose to reject the price you have chosen, and they might also be filtering for trademarks and ultra naughty language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

