<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name.com teams up with NameMedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=472#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>Name.com - provides nice business services = value for $$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name.com &#8211; provides nice business services = value for $$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=472#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>DHK - Perhaps  it&#039;s helpful to remember that while Name.com is certainly the Domainer&#039;s Friend... we&#039;re still a retail focused registrar. One of our goals is to provide the names our customers want. Now we&#039;re exposing our retail customers to an additional channel of domains that are available for them to purchase. 

For the best possible experience for those customers we&#039;re only offering for sale those names which can be instantly transferred and managed via their Name.com account. I know there are some non BuyDomains/Afternic owned domains which have been purchased and transferred but I&#039;ve not done a full analysis on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DHK &#8211; Perhaps  it&#8217;s helpful to remember that while Name.com is certainly the Domainer&#8217;s Friend&#8230; we&#8217;re still a retail focused registrar. One of our goals is to provide the names our customers want. Now we&#8217;re exposing our retail customers to an additional channel of domains that are available for them to purchase. </p>
<p>For the best possible experience for those customers we&#8217;re only offering for sale those names which can be instantly transferred and managed via their Name.com account. I know there are some non BuyDomains/Afternic owned domains which have been purchased and transferred but I&#8217;ve not done a full analysis on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKH Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>DKH Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=472#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s just me, but I&#039;m still confused. What does &quot;We’re offering their catalog of aftermarket names on Name.com&quot; mean? And if names listed on Afternic DLS (like mine) are not going to be listed on Name.com, then why should we care It would seem that someone&#039;s private portfolio is going to be made available on name.com, in which case I&#039;m not sure how that will help any of us domainers. But again, perhaps it&#039;s just me who&#039;s confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just me, but I&#8217;m still confused. What does &#8220;We’re offering their catalog of aftermarket names on Name.com&#8221; mean? And if names listed on Afternic DLS (like mine) are not going to be listed on Name.com, then why should we care It would seem that someone&#8217;s private portfolio is going to be made available on name.com, in which case I&#8217;m not sure how that will help any of us domainers. But again, perhaps it&#8217;s just me who&#8217;s confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=472#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>Jamie - Actually we&#039;re not sending names through DLS. We&#039;re offering their catalog of aftermarket names on Name.com. 

Our expiring names are still available at Snapnames.

**Jamie Says**
Thank you for clearing that up Kellie. I was a little confused on the press release, but that makes sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie &#8211; Actually we&#8217;re not sending names through DLS. We&#8217;re offering their catalog of aftermarket names on Name.com. </p>
<p>Our expiring names are still available at Snapnames.</p>
<p>**Jamie Says**<br />
Thank you for clearing that up Kellie. I was a little confused on the press release, but that makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name.com teams up with NameMedia for expired domains &#124; autocarsinsurance</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/namecom-teams-up-with-namemedia-for-expired-domains/#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Name.com teams up with NameMedia for expired domains &#124; autocarsinsurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=472#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Jamie Zoch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Jamie Zoch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

