Please see update below as well
LuckyMan.com is currently on auction at Afternic.com but the bad news, the domain is owned by Tucows….. so I won’t be bidding. (minus my test bid)
I was watching this domain for sometime and it just went to auction. I checked the bidding and noticed something a bit odd. I never bid on domains at Afternic auction, so I am not 100% sure on how the system works but I placed a test bid to see what would happen and see if it backed up what I was thinking..
It appears the High Bidders "Proxy Bid" is visable for all bidders checking Bid History to see.
.png)
Now if this is the case, that’s not right! You can see in the SS above, the Current bid is $75 by obadaz. That bidder was also the high bidder at $65 when I placed a test bid at $70. I was outbid from the start and the price went up to $75 and Current moved to that bid for the status.
I would bet if somebody bid up to like $900 or $975, obadaz would still be the high bidder???? I checked all other current auctions and there bid history and none of them looked like this one by showing a much higher bid price like this. I sent an email to Afternic to clerify but wanted to see if others have seen this before or if it’s what I think it is.
This is the reply that I recieved from Afternic below:
"I wanted to follow up with you on your question regarding proxy bid display on Afternic.
Proxy bids are never shown on Afternic (I am getting a volume of emails from sellers who read your post who ask why we do this – we do not).
In the case of the domain you were inquiring about, there was a problem with the bidding that occurred on this name which resulted in the name auction being taken offline for a period of time to rectify the problem. When the problem was corrected, the bidding showed a “jump” to a higher level – the interim bids did not display. The bid shown is not – and never was – a proxy bid.
Peter Lamson - Afternic.com"
I think there was an error with the auction, but clearly as Comment # 7 says below, the bidder stated they put a proxy bid in for $1,000 . Secondly, I think as Peter stated, it was simply an error, but the $1,000 should of been removed as well during the fixing of the problem.
This "error" might also be noticed when you compare the two (2) different bid times for the $1,000 bid amount.
.png)
The first screenshot shows the $1,000 bid placed on 26-Oct-2008 8:12 PM EDT. The screenshot just above shows the $1,000 bid amount placed on 13-Nov-2008 1:00 AM EST.
Different Time Zones, different Dates.
Either way, it never looks good when things are "different", bid history is changed and all of that. Pete has assured me of no "Hidden Plan/Plot to take advantage of anybody" but I still feel the people that saw the same SS that I did (top) had a very good idea that the $1,000 bid they could see questioned if it was a proxy bid or not. You can also see a rolling screenshot of the bid history here and you can choose for yourself.