Comments on: Pizza.com follow up. What has the new owner done with it? http://www.dotweekly.com/pizzacom-follow-up-what-has-the-new-owner-done-with-it/ Sun, 20 May 2012 18:20:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Michael http://www.dotweekly.com/pizzacom-follow-up-what-has-the-new-owner-done-with-it/#comment-1646 Michael Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:51:10 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=443#comment-1646 I doubt it was several millions, probably closer to one million. I doubt it was several millions, probably closer to one million.

]]> By: lzy http://www.dotweekly.com/pizzacom-follow-up-what-has-the-new-owner-done-with-it/#comment-1642 lzy Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:34:19 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=443#comment-1642 Was the sale verified? I remember reading somewhere that the sale didn't go through? :o **Jamie Says** Yes, this time it SOLD. National A-1 Advertising is the new owner. The price was never disclosed as far as I know, but I'm sure it was 2+ Million. Was the sale verified? I remember reading somewhere that the sale didn’t go through? :o

**Jamie Says**

Yes, this time it SOLD. National A-1 Advertising is the new owner. The price was never disclosed as far as I know, but I’m sure it was 2+ Million.

]]> By: Pizza.com follow up. What has the new owner done with it? | Domain News http://www.dotweekly.com/pizzacom-follow-up-what-has-the-new-owner-done-with-it/#comment-1641 Pizza.com follow up. What has the new owner done with it? | Domain News Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:46:05 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=443#comment-1641 [...] [Source] Jamie Zoch [...] [...] [Source] Jamie Zoch [...]

]]> By: Patrick McDermott http://www.dotweekly.com/pizzacom-follow-up-what-has-the-new-owner-done-with-it/#comment-1640 Patrick McDermott Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:04:56 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=443#comment-1640 Jamie, I think the today version is much improved over the 2007 version which looked like it was pasted together with scissors and glue. Patrick P.S. Your consistently thoughtful and insightful posts are much appreciated. **Jamie Says** Thank you for the kind words Patrick! It means a lot. As for the 2007 site, I think it is nearly exactly the same, but it just looks a bit different due to it being an Archive.org page now. I know certain graphics and headers can be missing, but I think it looks nearly 100% the same. Unless I missed something when I looked at it, which very well could be. ;) Jamie,

I think the today version is much improved over the
2007 version which looked like it was pasted together with scissors and glue.

Patrick

P.S. Your consistently thoughtful and insightful posts are much appreciated.

**Jamie Says**
Thank you for the kind words Patrick! It means a lot. As for the 2007 site, I think it is nearly exactly the same, but it just looks a bit different due to it being an Archive.org page now. I know certain graphics and headers can be missing, but I think it looks nearly 100% the same. Unless I missed something when I looked at it, which very well could be. ;)

]]>