<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profits and Commissions During Domain Auctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Borgos</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Borgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2801#comment-9091</guid>
		<description>I think a big domain auction (like from Moniker.com) gets a much larger audience than the Snapnames drops, so it is not surprising to me that some domains sell for &quot;cheap&quot; at Snapnames but then go for higher prices later. This is even more true when it comes to selling to end users, since I assume they don&#039;t usually look at the snapnames drop auctions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a big domain auction (like from Moniker.com) gets a much larger audience than the Snapnames drops, so it is not surprising to me that some domains sell for &#8220;cheap&#8221; at Snapnames but then go for higher prices later. This is even more true when it comes to selling to end users, since I assume they don&#8217;t usually look at the snapnames drop auctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Michlick (Domain Name News)</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/#comment-9087</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Michlick (Domain Name News)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2801#comment-9087</guid>
		<description>@Jamie: Yep, this one is owned by Snapnames, so you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jamie: Yep, this one is owned by Snapnames, so you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/#comment-9081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2801#comment-9081</guid>
		<description>@Frank,
I was aware of what you are talking about, but I was pretty sure Snapnames (Oversee) owns Octopusdomains.net the registrar? So they would be paying themselves. Octopus is the one who grabbed the domain on the drop. I could be wrong that Oversee owns the registrar, but according to whois, Snapnames is the registrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frank,<br />
I was aware of what you are talking about, but I was pretty sure Snapnames (Oversee) owns Octopusdomains.net the registrar? So they would be paying themselves. Octopus is the one who grabbed the domain on the drop. I could be wrong that Oversee owns the registrar, but according to whois, Snapnames is the registrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Michlick (Domain Name News)</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/profits-and-commissions-during-domain-auctions/#comment-9080</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Michlick (Domain Name News)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2801#comment-9080</guid>
		<description>Great topic - just a quick comment. When a dropcatcher registers the name on a drop, they pay a percentage of the sales price to the registrar whose connection they used to grab the domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic &#8211; just a quick comment. When a dropcatcher registers the name on a drop, they pay a percentage of the sales price to the registrar whose connection they used to grab the domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

