Comments on: Retweet.com NOT For Sale on NameJet.com http://www.dotweekly.com/retweetcom-not-for-sale-on-namejetcom/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: NameJet GM http://www.dotweekly.com/retweetcom-not-for-sale-on-namejetcom/#comment-6161 NameJet GM Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:01:21 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1789#comment-6161 Jamie, We will work with our partners to ensure that registration status is verified during the process of compiling their expired inventory to send to us. Jamie,
We will work with our partners to ensure that registration status is verified during the process of compiling their expired inventory to send to us.

]]> By: Jamie Zoch http://www.dotweekly.com/retweetcom-not-for-sale-on-namejetcom/#comment-6156 Jamie Zoch Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:07:59 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1789#comment-6156 @NameJet GM Thank you for stopping by and explaining what happened, while also removing the issue. Will there be any new safeguards put in place to prevent like problems from happening in the future? @NameJet GM
Thank you for stopping by and explaining what happened, while also removing the issue. Will there be any new safeguards put in place to prevent like problems from happening in the future?

]]> By: NameJet GM http://www.dotweekly.com/retweetcom-not-for-sale-on-namejetcom/#comment-6153 NameJet GM Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:59:00 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1789#comment-6153 We apologize for the confusion. NameSecure supplies NameJet pre-release inventory through our partner Network Solutions and apparently retweet.com was not marked as transferred away in their systems. We have removed it from the system. We apologize for the confusion. NameSecure supplies NameJet pre-release inventory through our partner Network Solutions and apparently retweet.com was not marked as transferred away in their systems. We have removed it from the system.

]]> By: LittleDevil http://www.dotweekly.com/retweetcom-not-for-sale-on-namejetcom/#comment-6150 LittleDevil Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:31:53 +0000 http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1789#comment-6150 We thought it was a strange listing but hadn't done much more investigation. We posted an update to the story with a backlink to your update. Thank you We thought it was a strange listing but hadn’t done much more investigation. We posted an update to the story with a backlink to your update. Thank you

]]>