<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Domain Name Affiliate Programs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/#comment-15859</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=3826#comment-15859</guid>
		<description>Hi, CJ is not working well for me, neither. Be aware that CJ is treated as scam for many bloggers. I personally had a bad experience with them after I was surprised why I didn&#039;t get any money from them, while I did with other affiliates running in the same sites. You can check here: http://www.netvivs.com/the-bad-experience-i-had-with-commission-junction-cj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, CJ is not working well for me, neither. Be aware that CJ is treated as scam for many bloggers. I personally had a bad experience with them after I was surprised why I didn&#8217;t get any money from them, while I did with other affiliates running in the same sites. You can check here: <a href="http://www.netvivs.com/the-bad-experience-i-had-with-commission-junction-cj" rel="nofollow">http://www.netvivs.com/the-bad-experience-i-had-with-commission-junction-cj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/#comment-15806</link>
		<dc:creator>jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 04:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=3826#comment-15806</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting article. My experience with Godaddy is about the same.

I think the main problems is: Third party cookies blocked by most browsers and add blockers. Godaddy just won&#039;t pay if they 3rd party cookie isn&#039;t there -- even though they know they got the order.

My 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting article. My experience with Godaddy is about the same.</p>
<p>I think the main problems is: Third party cookies blocked by most browsers and add blockers. Godaddy just won&#8217;t pay if they 3rd party cookie isn&#8217;t there &#8212; even though they know they got the order.</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esa</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/#comment-10414</link>
		<dc:creator>Esa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=3826#comment-10414</guid>
		<description>Great post Jamie.

I have some experience because I used to run various affiliate links on Estibot 1.0 for a couple of years, the site got about 800,000 hits monthly.

I largely agree with your analysis. Not only is SEDO the worst converting affiliate program, but I find it very hard to believe it is actually even tracking conversions properly. I was actually planning to write a blog post about it soon. I&#039;m not saying, I&#039;m just saying. I would stay away from that affiliate program for various reasons. Waste of pixels to display their ads.

I actually did OK with the GoDaddy CJ link when I redirected whois queries through that link. GoDaddy seems to have a decent cookie.

Moniker seemed to perform OK as well. Afternic is kinda like SEDO - poor conversion percentage, but at least their terms are clear.

Snapnames was pretty good, and after essociate it was still converting OK but obviously less money.

I&#039;m going to write more about this soon.

BTW Worth noting is that Estibot will pay you RECURRING commission for each member you refer. And it doesn&#039;t matter if they&#039;re already Estibot members - make them convert to a paying account or upgrade to a higher level plan, and the commission is yours.

Not many pay RECURRING commissions. We do. There are still domainers out there who don&#039;t have a paid Estibot subscription. Can you imagine :)

Cheers!
Esa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jamie.</p>
<p>I have some experience because I used to run various affiliate links on Estibot 1.0 for a couple of years, the site got about 800,000 hits monthly.</p>
<p>I largely agree with your analysis. Not only is SEDO the worst converting affiliate program, but I find it very hard to believe it is actually even tracking conversions properly. I was actually planning to write a blog post about it soon. I&#8217;m not saying, I&#8217;m just saying. I would stay away from that affiliate program for various reasons. Waste of pixels to display their ads.</p>
<p>I actually did OK with the GoDaddy CJ link when I redirected whois queries through that link. GoDaddy seems to have a decent cookie.</p>
<p>Moniker seemed to perform OK as well. Afternic is kinda like SEDO &#8211; poor conversion percentage, but at least their terms are clear.</p>
<p>Snapnames was pretty good, and after essociate it was still converting OK but obviously less money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to write more about this soon.</p>
<p>BTW Worth noting is that Estibot will pay you RECURRING commission for each member you refer. And it doesn&#8217;t matter if they&#8217;re already Estibot members &#8211; make them convert to a paying account or upgrade to a higher level plan, and the commission is yours.</p>
<p>Not many pay RECURRING commissions. We do. There are still domainers out there who don&#8217;t have a paid Estibot subscription. Can you imagine <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Esa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/review-domain-name-affiliate-programs/#comment-10413</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=3826#comment-10413</guid>
		<description>The best there is.... ;)

http://www.domainmassdevelopment.com/affiliates/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best there is&#8230;. <img src='http://www.dotweekly.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.domainmassdevelopment.com/affiliates/" rel="nofollow">http://www.domainmassdevelopment.com/affiliates/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

