<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round 2.. Who owned the reported Afternic sales?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/round-2-who-owned-the-reported-afternic-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/round-2-who-owned-the-reported-afternic-sales/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 2k &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Round 2.. Who owned the reported Afternic sales?</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/round-2-who-owned-the-reported-afternic-sales/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>2k &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Round 2.. Who owned the reported Afternic sales?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=373#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>[...] Round 2.. Who owned the reported Afternic sales? From what I can tell, a hot price range is $2K-$7K. If the majority of your domains are not listed with a buy it now in the price range you&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Round 2.. Who owned the reported Afternic sales? From what I can tell, a hot price range is $2K-$7K. If the majority of your domains are not listed with a buy it now in the price range you&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lam, DMD</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/round-2-who-owned-the-reported-afternic-sales/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lam, DMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=373#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>&quot;So 2 of the 25 domains that I looked into today were listed by members. This put’s it at 80% of the domains were owned by Afternic that were reported sold.&quot; 

That would make it 92% Afternic owned reported sales.

**Jamie Says**
Thank you Tony. I have adjusted the number to be correct. 23/25 is 92%. Not sure why I was thinking 80%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So 2 of the 25 domains that I looked into today were listed by members. This put’s it at 80% of the domains were owned by Afternic that were reported sold.&#8221; </p>
<p>That would make it 92% Afternic owned reported sales.</p>
<p>**Jamie Says**<br />
Thank you Tony. I have adjusted the number to be correct. 23/25 is 92%. Not sure why I was thinking 80%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/round-2-who-owned-the-reported-afternic-sales/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=373#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>Note that if you make bulk price changes in Afternic with the Edit Listings view, the category will be erased.  But adjusting a large number of domain prices one by one is time consuming.  In either case, I can see now the benefit of categorizing more of my domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that if you make bulk price changes in Afternic with the Edit Listings view, the category will be erased.  But adjusting a large number of domain prices one by one is time consuming.  In either case, I can see now the benefit of categorizing more of my domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

