<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snuggie For Kids Rebrands It&#8217;s Blanket With Sleeves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/#comment-7820</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2366#comment-7820</guid>
		<description>Dan if by “captured” you meant &quot;acquire from the Registrant&quot;, then pardon my comment.

The company may be too cheap to pony up the bucks.

By the way, anyone who buys Snuggie.com would be taking a risk.

In all likelihood, the original 2002 registration date would not apply to the new owner as evidenced by many UDRP decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan if by “captured” you meant &#8220;acquire from the Registrant&#8221;, then pardon my comment.</p>
<p>The company may be too cheap to pony up the bucks.</p>
<p>By the way, anyone who buys Snuggie.com would be taking a risk.</p>
<p>In all likelihood, the original 2002 registration date would not apply to the new owner as evidenced by many UDRP decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/#comment-7819</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2366#comment-7819</guid>
		<description>&quot;...they failed to capture Snuggie.com...&quot;

Dan,

They couldn&#039;t have &quot;captured&quot; Snuggie.com since it&#039;s been regged since 2002.

They also do not own Snuggies.com. That&#039;s used by a department store and has been regged since 1997.

They opted for GetSnuggie.com which was regged July 2008.

But they didn&#039;t have the sense or foresight to protect their brand and also register GetSnuggies.com.

That was regged 3 months later Oversee.

They&#039;d most likely lose it in a UDRP proceeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;they failed to capture Snuggie.com&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Dan,</p>
<p>They couldn&#8217;t have &#8220;captured&#8221; Snuggie.com since it&#8217;s been regged since 2002.</p>
<p>They also do not own Snuggies.com. That&#8217;s used by a department store and has been regged since 1997.</p>
<p>They opted for GetSnuggie.com which was regged July 2008.</p>
<p>But they didn&#8217;t have the sense or foresight to protect their brand and also register GetSnuggies.com.</p>
<p>That was regged 3 months later Oversee.</p>
<p>They&#8217;d most likely lose it in a UDRP proceeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/#comment-7817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2366#comment-7817</guid>
		<description>I agree they missed the boat on that one and that&#039;s for the main brand. Suggie For Kids was a rebrand of the Snugglette name itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree they missed the boat on that one and that&#8217;s for the main brand. Suggie For Kids was a rebrand of the Snugglette name itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/snuggie-for-kids-blanket-with-sleeves/#comment-7816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=2366#comment-7816</guid>
		<description>Well they failed to capture Snuggie.com which has gotten over 4k hits since their re-brand. 

The domain is actually for sale at Godaddy

https://auctions.godaddy.com/trpItemListing.aspx?ci=6711&amp;domain=snuggie.com

Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they failed to capture Snuggie.com which has gotten over 4k hits since their re-brand. </p>
<p>The domain is actually for sale at Godaddy</p>
<p><a href="https://auctions.godaddy.com/trpItemListing.aspx?ci=6711&#038;domain=snuggie.com" rel="nofollow">https://auctions.godaddy.com/trpItemListing.aspx?ci=6711&#038;domain=snuggie.com</a></p>
<p>Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

