<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Escrow.com is NOT safe for domain name transactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 18:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/#comment-12618</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=551#comment-12618</guid>
		<description>Well Escrow.com is the only true escrow service in this group and therefore the only truly neutral third party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Escrow.com is the only true escrow service in this group and therefore the only truly neutral third party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IG</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>IG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=551#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>Although I have used escrow successfuly for a domain transfer but I agree with you here. Your point is valid considering that there are many scammers now.

Thanks for the great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I have used escrow successfuly for a domain transfer but I agree with you here. Your point is valid considering that there are many scammers now.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/#comment-2466</link>
		<dc:creator>warren mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=551#comment-2466</guid>
		<description>im buying a domain today, i dont have a credit card, the guy im buying from seems to be the guy on the whois, he&#039;s put it on escrow.com and  i gotta go transfer the funds via wire transfer.

its $800, im shitting myself. its a top domain and dont want to lose, he seems on the level. is this fixable if it fucks up? escros rules and support seem ambiguous to say the least.

**Jamie Says**
I would rather use EscrowDNS.com then Escrow does not handle anything with the transfer of the domain and that can lead into headaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im buying a domain today, i dont have a credit card, the guy im buying from seems to be the guy on the whois, he&#8217;s put it on escrow.com and  i gotta go transfer the funds via wire transfer.</p>
<p>its $800, im shitting myself. its a top domain and dont want to lose, he seems on the level. is this fixable if it fucks up? escros rules and support seem ambiguous to say the least.</p>
<p>**Jamie Says**<br />
I would rather use EscrowDNS.com then Escrow does not handle anything with the transfer of the domain and that can lead into headaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EscrowDNS.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>EscrowDNS.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=551#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>Yes we do require the seller to push the domain name to us, we will then handle the transfer to the buyer. We also have several safeguards in place to protect both the buyer and seller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we do require the seller to push the domain name to us, we will then handle the transfer to the buyer. We also have several safeguards in place to protect both the buyer and seller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godolphin</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/why-escrowcom-is-not-safe-for-domain-name-transactions/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Godolphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=551#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>Your recommendations are correct. I too prefer Moniker Escrow or EscrowDNS. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your recommendations are correct. I too prefer Moniker Escrow or EscrowDNS. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

