<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Releases Version 2.8 (Barker)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotweekly.com/wordpress-releases-version-28-barker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/wordpress-releases-version-28-barker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Zoch</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/wordpress-releases-version-28-barker/#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Zoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1741#comment-6046</guid>
		<description>@Leonard,
I have used XSite Pro for several sites. I think it can do just as well SEO wise as WP and works just as well for Minisites. It&#039;s easier to get a &quot;Full Site&quot; look for the average person via XSite Pro IMO. The major down fall to XSite Pro is the software, as you can only access your sites via the computer the software is on. Templates are limited as well. The great thing about WP are all the plugins and themes available, ease of use and can be accessed from any computer with internet access. I do like both and use both, but would give the upper hand to WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leonard,<br />
I have used XSite Pro for several sites. I think it can do just as well SEO wise as WP and works just as well for Minisites. It&#8217;s easier to get a &#8220;Full Site&#8221; look for the average person via XSite Pro IMO. The major down fall to XSite Pro is the software, as you can only access your sites via the computer the software is on. Templates are limited as well. The great thing about WP are all the plugins and themes available, ease of use and can be accessed from any computer with internet access. I do like both and use both, but would give the upper hand to WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.dotweekly.com/wordpress-releases-version-28-barker/#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotweekly.com/?p=1741#comment-6036</guid>
		<description>Hi Jamie.  I&#039;m curious what your experience has been XSite Pro versus Wordpress.  I sense Wordpress may have more options as far as templates and plugins but it would still be an additional learning curve.  Regardless I don&#039;t want to become overly dependent on a software I can only run on one machine.  But XSite Pro at least got me beyond parked domains waiting for a buyer. Ten sites since late March...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jamie.  I&#8217;m curious what your experience has been XSite Pro versus WordPress.  I sense WordPress may have more options as far as templates and plugins but it would still be an additional learning curve.  Regardless I don&#8217;t want to become overly dependent on a software I can only run on one machine.  But XSite Pro at least got me beyond parked domains waiting for a buyer. Ten sites since late March&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

